This is an application for relief made in terms of s 85(1)(a) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013 (“the Constitution”). The applicant is acting in her own interests although she also invokes the alleged violation of the rights of Movement for Democratic Change-Tsvangirai (“MDC-T”), a political party of which she is a member. More
This is a chamber application for an order for leave for direct access to the Constitutional Court (“the Court”), made in terms of s 167(5) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013 (“the Constitution”), as read with r 21(2) of the Constitutional Court Rules SI 61/2016 (“the Rules”). More
This is an opposed application for leave to appeal against a decision of the Supreme Court (“the court a quo”) made in terms of s 167(5)(b) of the Constitution as read with r 32(2) of the Constitutional Court Rules, 2016 (“the Rules”). More
This matter was initially set down on the Supreme Court roll as an appeal matter. At the hearing of the appeal, the respondent submitted that the matter raised a constitutional issue of whether the law of parate executie violates the access to the courts provision, s 69(3) of the current Constitution of Zimbabwe (“the Constitution”). Mr Matinenga applied for a referral to the Constitutional Court for the determination of that issue. More
This is an application for direct access brought in terms of s 167 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013 as read with rule 21 of the Constitutional Court Rules, 2016. In the event that this application is granted, the applicant intends to apply for a declaratory order that the judgment of the Supreme Court under SC 126/23 violated his fundamental rights in terms of sections 56 (1), 68 (1) & (2) and 69 (2) & (3) of the Constitution. More
