Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The first respondent approached the court a quo by way of an application seeking an interdict against the appellant and the second respondent barring them from entering its farm in Arcturus, Goromonzi and from laying any rights to a certain mining claim situated thereon. The first respondent also sought an order that the appellant and the second respondent stop all mining operations at the mining claim. In its founding affidavit deposed to by one Morrison Bimbi, the first respondent averred as follows: It was the owner of a certain piece of land called the remainder of Lot 4 of the... More

This is an appeal against the judgement of the High Court in Case No. HC 5569/17 in which the High Court dismissed an urgent chamber application seeking the stay of the appellant’s detention, which was ordered by the Commissioner -General of Police (the second respondent), pending the finalisation of an application for review by the High Court of the proceedings before the single trial officer (the first respondent). More

On 17 April 2019 the High Court handed down a judgment in which it issued the following order: - 1. The order of this Court granted on 12 December 2018 under Case No. HC 7399/18 acquitting the applicants namely Sesedzai Munobvanei and Mhondiwa Nyamande under CRB MRWP 944-5/18 at the close of the State case was made in error and is hereby rescinded. 2. For the avoidance of doubt, the trial magistrate shall proceed with the trial forthwith by putting the applicants on their defence as already ordered by this Court under Case No HH748/18 3. This judgment shall be... More

This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 24 September 2018 wherein it granted the first respondent’s claim against the appellant. More

This is an appeal against the judgment of the Labour Court sitting at Harare (the court a quo) delivered on 5 October 2023, dismissing the appellant’s appeal against the determination of the designated Appeals Officer of the respondent. The Appeals Officer dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the determination of the Disciplinary Authority which found the appellant guilty of misconduct and dismissed him from employment. More