The appellant was employed by the respondent as a Vehicle Sales Manager on 2 June 2014. On 4 December 2014, he was charged with gross incompetence or inefficiency in the performance of his work in terms of s 4(f) of the Labour (National Employment Code) Regulations, 2006 (SI 15/06) also referred to as the National Code. A disciplinary hearing was held and the Hearing Officer found the appellant guilty and his contract of employment was terminated. The appellant appealed the decision of the Hearing Officer to the Chief Operations Officer who did not respond to the appeal. The appellant had... More
This is a chamber application for the condonation of non-compliance with the Rules of this Court and for an extension of time within which to note an appeal against the judgment of the High Court in Case No. HC 5315/07, handed down on 19 February 2015 as Judgment No. HH 150-15. More
The appellant and the first respondent are former husband and wife, their marriage having been dissolved by a decree of divorce issued on 26 November 2019. Their proprietary rights were determined subsequently by judgment of the High Court (“the court a quo”) delivered on 24 July 2023. In that judgment, the court a quo distributed their property, including a farm known as Randhurst Grange Estate situate in the district of Goromonzi measuring 926.5930 hectares (“Machipisa farm”) and a business known as Zororo Energy Private Limited (“Zororo Energy”), which properties form the basis of this appeal, the appellant having appealed against... More
This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the High Court sitting at Bulawayo handed down on 4 June 2020 as HB 87/20, under HC 1124/17. The part appealed againstis the order by the court a quo dismissing the application for amendment in respect of an alternative claim and prayer seeking to compel the respondents to transfer 8000 squaremetres of land to the appellant. More
MAVANGIRA JA:
1. This is an appeal against the entire judgment of the High Court sitting at Harare, in which the court granted a declaratur in favour ofthe first respondent asserting that hewas the lawful holder of rights and interests in the property known as stand 6401 Retreat Waterfalls. The court also ordered that the appellant and all those in occupation through her should vacate the property. More
