On 19 April 2023, the applicant sought condonation for failure to file an application for leave to appeal within the prescribed period and for leave to appeal. The first part of the application is in terms of r 43 (3) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018. The other part is made in terms of r 60 (2) as read with r 43 (7) of the said Supreme Court Rules and s 92F (3) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] (the Act). It is contested by his former employer, National Foods Limited (the first respondent). More
This is an application for leave to appeal from a judgment of the Labor Court. The court a quo found no merit in the application for leave to appeal and dismissed it, on the main that the draft notice of appeal did not raise questions of law. The applicant was dissatisfied with the judgment of the court a quo and filed an application for leave in terms of r 60 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018. More
This is an application for condonation and extension of time within which to note a review application in terms of r 13 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018 More
This is a court application filed in terms of r 449 of the High Court Rules, 1971 in which the applicant seeks an order rescinding the order granted by this court on 27 November 2019. In terms of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018 the High Court Rules apply whenever there is a lacuna in the Rules of this Court. The application is opposed by the respondent. More
This appeal, against the whole judgment of the High Court sitting at Harare (the court a quo) handed down on 19 October 2023, was initially launched only by the first appellant in his capacity as the executor testamentary of the estate of the late Grace Mandaza. The late Grace Mandaza was sued by the first respondent in the court a quo in her capacity as the executrix dative of the estate of her late husband Joel Mandaza as well as in her personal capacity. More
