This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court (“the court a quo”) which was handed down on 14 August 2024, in which it held that the fifth and sixth respondents were the substantive Bishop and vice bishop respectively, of Mugodhi Apostolic Faith Church (“the church”). The court a quo in its judgment further interdicted the second appellant from holding himself out as the bishop of the church. More
MATHONSI JA: This is an automatic appeal in terms of s 44 (2) (c) of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06], against the conviction of the first and the second appellants by the High Court (the court a quo) of the crime of murder on 29 June 2023 and their subsequent sentence to death on 2 July 2023. If the appeal had not been automatic, one would have been left wondering what possessed those involved in the appeal to embark on it owing, not only to the overwhelming evidence staked against the appellants, but also to the brutal and senseless... More
This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court holding that a conglomerate is a “merger” as defined in terms of s 2 of the Competition Act [Chapter 14:28] (“the Act”) and, therefore, notifiable to the respondent in terms of s 3A of the Act if its value exceeded the statutory threshold. More
This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the High Court (the court a quo) sitting at Harare, dated 26 May 2021 wherein the court a quo granted an application made by the first respondent for the registration of a foreign judgment emanating from the Business and Property Court of the United Kingdom and Wales as a judgment of the High Court of Zimbabwe, capable of execution within Zimbabwe. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 31 March 2015, in which the court a quo dismissed the appellants’ application for rescission of judgment for want of prosecution. More
