This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Labour Court, handed down on 25 August 2017, confirming a ruling by the fourth respondent, a labour officer that the termination of the employment of the first to third respondents by the appellant was unlawful. In consequence thereof, the appellant was ordered to reinstate the first to third respondents without loss of salary or benefits or, in the alternative, pay damages. More
The appellant was employed by the respondent as an accounts administrator.She was also a member of the workers committee. She was charged with misconduct in terms of the Old Mutual Code of Conduct and Grievance Procedure,(in particular s 15.9), for failure to fulfill the expressed or implied conditions of her contract of employment or any breach of the employment contract. The allegations against her were that during the morning of 9 July 2019 she misrepresented to and mobilized Old Mutual employees to gather in the Mutual Gardens canteen. This was on the pretext that the Human Capital Executive wanted to... More
This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the Special Court for Income Tax Appeals handed down on 28 September 2020, dismissing the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the respondent’s Commissioner in respect of various objections the appellant had raised against the Commissioner’s revised assessments of tax against it. More
This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Zimbabwe granting an order for the eviction of the appellants and all other persons claiming occupation through them, from a property known as Share Number 24 of Subdivision A, Portion of Mayfield Estate, also known as Monavale Cluster Homes. More
This is an appeal against the entire judgment of the High Court delivered on 5 February 2020. The court a quo held that eighty-five percent (85%) of Number 16 Hawkshead Drive, Borrowdale, also known as Lot 1 of Lot 4 of Lot FA Quinnington situate in the District of Salisbury measuring 1, 2770 Morgen held under Title Deed 3999/96 be awarded to the respondent as her sole and absolute share with the appellant being awarded the remaining 15 per cent share. More
