This is a composite judgment in respect of three appeals which were heard at the same time. The appeals are against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 14 May 2020. They all rely on essentially the same grounds of appeal. The three appellants were the respondents in the court a quo but filed separate appeals under SC 183/20, SC 187/20 and SC 203/20. More
2. The first to third respondents were employed by the appellant as Managing Director CFI Holdings Retail, Managing Director Victoria Foods and Chief Operating Officer CFI Holdings Limited respectively. Their contracts of employment were terminated on notice by identical letters dated 26 January 2016. They were each given three months’ written notice. The letters of termination indicated that they were not required to serve the period of notice but that they should immediately leave the premises of the appellant.
3. The respondents were disgruntled by the appellant’s decision to terminate their employment and approached a Labour Officer with claims of... More
1. This is an appeal against the entire judgment of the High Court (“the court a quo”), wherein it dismissed the appellant’s application for condonation for the late filing of an application for the upliftment of the bar, to file an appearance to defend, as well as the application for the upliftment of the bar itself. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court (court a quo) in which the court granted an application for the registration of the judgment of the Labour Court amounting to US $177 408.00 in favour of the respondent. More
1. This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the General Court Martial (the court a quo) which convicted the appellants of robbery as defined in s 39 (2) (a) of the First Schedule to the Defence Act [Chapter 11:02], as read with s 126 (a) of the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act [Chapter 9:23] (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code’). The robbery was committed at Chidamoyo Hospital (the hospital), Karoi. The appellants were jointly tried with Major Fortune Murondatsimba to whom they attributed the orders constituting the basis of their defence. More
