This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court of Zimbabwe (court a quo) handed down on 5 October 2022, dismissing the appellants’ application for the setting aside of an arbitral award made in terms of Article 34 of the First Schedule to the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15] (‘the Arbitration Act’). More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 31 July 2023, in which it confirmed the cancellation of an agreement of sale between the first respondent and the appellants. More
The applicant filed an urgent chamber application for the setting aside of para 11 of the High Court’s order made after hearing consolidated opposed applications in H/C 6272/19, H/C 6630/19 and H/C 6692. In para 11 of its order the court a quo ordered that:
“Notwithstanding any appeal that the first respondent may file against this order, the operation of this order shall not be suspended by the filing of such an appeal.”
The court a quo’s order in para 11 was clearly intended to render the anticipated appeal by the applicant ineffective as regards the suspension of the orders... More
HLATSHWAYO JA: This is an appeal against the entire judgment delivered by the Honourable Justice Zhou in the High Court of Zimbabwe.
The order sought to be impugned reads as follows:
“IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Judgment be and is hereby given in favour of the plaintiff against the first, second and third defendants jointly and severally the one paying the others to be absolved for:
(a) Payment of US$1 105 748.90 plus interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the 9 September 2015 such interest calculated monthly and in advance on the said sum and... More
This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court sitting at Masvingo delivered on 24 June 2020 which dismissed with costs the application made by the two appellants for a declaratory order and an interdict.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The two appellants are sugar producing giants in the Lowveld while the first respondent is the statutory body charged with revenue collection in Zimbabwe. The remainder of the respondents are either sugar cane farmers or associations representing such farmers. The respondents will be referred to in this judgment for convenience, as Zimbabwe Revenue Authority and the farmers respectively More
