Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
1. This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court (court a quo). The suspension from office of the appellant led to a flurry of court applications in the court a quo. This is just one of them in which the court a quo dismissed the appellant’s application. The application was made in terms of s 4 of the Administrative Justice Act [Chapter 10:28] (‘the Act’) on the basis that the respondents had failed to comply with the provisions of s 3(1)(a) of the Act. More

[1] The first and third applicants seek condonation for the late noting of an appeal and extension of time within which to appeal. The application is contested by the first, third, fourth and sixth respondents. [2] The parties are fighting over the control of the Stoneridge Residents Association (the association). More

MATHONSI JA: The appellant brought an urgent chamber application in the High Court for a stay of the execution of a judgment obtained by the first respondent against the second and third respondents on 12 February 2018 in the sum of US$352 851,30 together with interest and costs of suit. By judgment delivered on 21 August 2020, the High Court dismissed the application with costs. This appeal is against that judgment dismissing the appellant’s urgent application. More

This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court, granted on 20 December 2018, confirming a provisional order granted by that court on 24 October 2017. The effect of the judgment was to set aside the sale and transfer of the property in dispute to the fourth and fifth respondents and to enable the first and second respondents to exercise their alleged right of first refusal in respect of that property. More

This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court, the court a quo, sitting at Harare, dated 17 June 2021 granting a declaratur to the effect that the Deed of Settlement signed by the parties on 13 November 2019 compromised the High Court order dated 26 February 2018, thereby creating new obligations between the parties. The court a quo also granted consequential relief flowing from the declaratur More