This is an application for condonation of late noting of appeal and extension of time within which to file the appeal in terms of r 31 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1964.
The parties were married but divorced in England. The court in England issued a decree nisi which the first respondent used to obtain an interdict in the local High Court. The interdict barred the applicant from dealing in the property known as No. 5 Reitfontein Close Highlands, Harare, which he claims to be his sole property. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High court handed down on 11 October 2018, dismissing the appellants’ application with costs on the higher scale. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High court handed down on 11 October 2018, dismissing the appellants’ application with costs on the higher scale. More
This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court (the court a quo) granting the respondent leave to appeal to the High Court against the appellant’s discharge at the close of the State case at the Magistrate’s Court. At the conclusion of the hearing we dismissed the appeal and indicated that our reasons will follow. These are the reasons.
FACTS
The appellant was arraigned before the MagistrateCourt charged with: -
1. Contravening Section 3(1) (a) of the Precious Stones Trade Act [Chapter 21:06] and;
2. Contravening Section 3(1) (a) of the Gold Trade Act, [Chapter 21:03].
In the... More
This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the High Courtawarding to the respondent, sole ownership of thematrimonial home, the payment of US$7 199.74 from their joint Lloyds Bank account, and the payment of US$5 000 as contribution towards the respondent’s legal costs and costs of suit. More
