[1] This is an appeal against the order of the High Court discharging with costs a provisional order granted in favour of the appellant on 17 June 2014. More
“This matter demonstrates the challenges which emerge from parties pursuing the same issue before different judges who may each be seized with different aspects of their appeals. The result is divergent judgments from the same court. More
This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court sitting at Bulawayo (“court a quo”) wherein the court sentenced the first appellant to three years imprisonment for each of the 17 counts he had been convicted of, with some counts being ordered to run concurrently, resulting in a total effective sentence of 45 years imprisonment. Similarly, the second appellant was sentenced to three years imprisonment for each of the 18 counts he had been convicted of, with certain counts running concurrently, leading to a total effective sentence of 48 years imprisonment. More
: On 9 April 2021 I struck off this matter from the roll and gave reasons extempore. The applicant has requested for written reason for my decision.These are the reasons.
In this application the applicant seeks to challenge the decision of the High Court handed down on 3 May 2018 dismissing his applicationfor condonation and leave to appeal in person. The application was purportedly filed in terms of r 21 of the Supreme Court Rules 2018.The applicant seeks an order in the following terms:
1. The application against refusal for condonation for the late filing of an appeal be
and... More
In August 2022, the applicant filed an urgent chamber application for an interdict against the respondents in the High Court, Bulawayo. In the application, the applicant sought to interdict the first and second respondents from carrying out any mining activities on the applicant’s mining claims; namely- Berea 17, Berea 18 and Site 232 within certain coordinates. More
