This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Intellectual Property Tribunal of Zimbabwe, “the Tribunal”, delivered at Harare on 29 May 2019 wherein the Tribunal upheld the appeal noted by the respondent against the decision of the Registrar of Trade Marks. More
The facts of the case can be summarised as follows;
[3] The appellant and the respondent were on 10 December 2010 married in terms of the Marriages Act [Chapter 5:11]. The union was blessed with two daughters born on 17 April 2009 and 21 January 2012.
[4] The respondent issued summons for divorce and ancillary relief claiming that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and that they had lost love and affection for each other. The appellant did not oppose the granting of divorce. More
UCHENA JA: This is an appeal against the wholejudgment of the Labour Court dated 22 March 2019setting aside an arbitral award which had been granted in favour of the appellant. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal handed down on 15 April 2021 as judgment number HH 167-21, under case number LPDT 09/18. The Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal) found the appellant guilty of conduct that was unprofessional, dishonourable and unworthy of a legal practitioner and ordered the deletion of his name from the register of Legal Practitioners, Notaries Public and Conveyancers. More
The appellant appeals against an order handed down by the High Court (the court a quo) on 29 June 2021. The court a quo dismissed his application for condonation and upliftment of the bar. The bar arose from the appellant’s failure to serve his appearance to defend on the respondents within 24 hours, in breach of r 49 of the then subsisting High Court rules, 1971. These rules were repealed and replaced by the new rules, High Court rules, 2021 on 23 July 2021. More
