3. The appellant is a company duly incorporated in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. The respondent is also a company incorporated in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe and is registered as a commercial bank. Sometime in March 2013, the parties entered into a loan agreement in terms of which the respondent granted a short-term loan facility to the appellant for an amount of USD160 000. In terms of the loan agreement, the appellant was to finance its business activities, particularly the procurement of raw materials. The appellant was also obliged to pay the respondent an amount equivalent to... More
HLATSHWAYO JA: This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Fiscal Appeal Courthanded down on 1 November 2016 under judgment number HH 661/16 of case number FA 08/14, in terms of which the court handed down judgment in favour of the respondent.
The appellant seeks relief in the following terms:
WHEREFORE Appellant prays that the appeal be allowed with costs and that the order of the court a quo be set aside and substituted with the following:-
"The appeal be and is hereby allowed as prayed" More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court of Zimbabwe (the court a quo) handed down at Mutare on 9 May 2022 declining jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for a declaratory order of spoliation sought by the appellant. More
MATHONSI JA: On 2 July 2020 the High Court granted an application made by the present first respondent for the removal of the applicant from the position of executrix of the estate of the late RemnsiMachokoto. The applicant, having failed to note an appeal against that judgment within the time allowed by the rules of this Court, has made this application interms of r 43 (1) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018 for condonation of the late noting of an appeal and extension of time within which to appeal. The application is strongly opposed by the first respondent More
This is an appeal against the judgment of the Labour Court dated 14 July 2017 which dismissed an application for review mounted by the appellant. After reading the documents and hearing counsel, we dismissed the appeal with costs and indicated that reasons would be availed in due course. More
