This is an appeal in terms of section 65 of the Income Tax Act, ( ITA) where on 3 March 2020 the parties agreed that the main issues for determination would be the following:
“1. Whether or not the respondent failed to give reasons for reassessing the appellant thus rendering the assessment unlawful.
2. Whether or not there was any fraud, misrepresentation or willful non- disclosure of facts entitling the Respondent to reassess the Appellant for the years 2010 and 2011 after the expiry of the six (6) year prescription period?
3. Whether or not General Notice 274 of 2010... More
This is an urgent court application for an actio rei vindicatio in respect of a motor vehicle, a Toyota Hilux (Double Cab) Registration No. AFU 9680. The motor vehicle belongs to the applicant. It was allocated to the respondent for use as an employment benefit. It is common cause that the respondent is no longer an employee of the applicant, having been retrenched and given his retrenchment package. More
The 1st defendant leased its premises to the plaintiff in June 2009 for the warehousing, storage and related handling of tobacco bales. The 2nd defendant contracted to provide security services for the premises and its contents. Following the loss of 1446 bales of tobacco, the plaintiff sued both defendants for their value in the sum of US$438,355. The plaintiff’s claim is grounded in contract or, in the alternative, in negligence. More
This is an application for an order to compel the Respondent to deliver and or furnish the Applicant with Bills of Entry concerning certain computers imported and supplied to the Applicant by the Respondent as per the contract entered into by and between the parties hereto. The Applicant seeks an order that should Respondent fail to furnish Applicant with the Bills of Entry within 7 days of the Order being served on it, then the Respondent shall be liable to pay the penalty that will be levied against the Applicant by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe in relation thereto. More
On 23 May 2024, the court refused first and second respondents` application for upliftment of a bar. The court furnished the reasons thereof ex tempore and issued the following order; -
1) The application for upliftment of the bar by First and Second Respondents for failure to file heads of argument in terms of the Rules of Court be and is hereby dismissed with costs.
2) Matter to proceed as unopposed. More
