Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The Applicant brought this application pursuant to Article 13 of Schedule 1 of the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15] for the recusal of Mr. Terry, the second Respondent, as Arbitrator of Applicant’s dispute with the first Respondent. More

This is an opposed application wherein the applicant seeks the following relief:- “1 Respondent shall within two hours of the service of this order on him restore the following property to the applicant; (a) Mitsubishi Pajero 3.0 Registration Number AAV-5956; (b) laptop HP Compaq 6720; (c) Cellphone Samsung D880 2. The cost of this application shall be borne by the respondent”. More

This is an application for vindication. The application was first argued before me on 11 March 2010 and on 21 July 2010, I ruled that the High Court had no jurisdiction since the matter before me was a labour dispute. The applicant appealed against my ruling and on 31 January 2011 the Supreme Court issued the following order:- “IT IS RDERED THAT: 1. The appeal be and is hereby allowed with costs. 2. The order of the High Court is set aside with costs. 3. The matter be remitted to the High Court for determination before the same Judge” More

On 30 November 2018, Plaintiff and 1st Defendant entered into a verbal agreement. Under that agreement, Plaintiff paid an amount of US$87,000.00 in return for the delivery of a motor vehicle, a Toyota Land Cruiser Prado VX Chassis Number JJEBH3FJ4OK20718. [the motor vehicle]. The motor vehicle described above was imported into Zimbabwe from South Africa by the 1st Defendant. In or around June 2021, the aforesaid motor vehicle was seized from Plaintiff by the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority [ZIMRA] on the basis that its importation into Zimbabwe had been done fraudulently. The Defendants were duly notified of that development. Despite making... More

On 20 November 2009, Zimbabwe Allied Banking Group Ltd issued summons out of this court seeking an order of specific performance alternatively damages. It was served by the plaintiff’s legal practitioners Mawere and Sibanda on the defendant’s legal practitioners, Madziwanzira, Gama and Associates on 3 December 2009. Appearance was filed on 8 December 2009. On 7 January the defendant requested for further particulars, which were supplied on 12 January 2010. Further and better particulars requested on 29 January were furnished on 3 February 2010. More