Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This a court application in which the relief sought is the following declaratory order;- 1. Applicant is entitled to all benefits deriving from the occupation by the respondent of that section of Bulfield Farm which is the subject of Notarial Deed of Servitude 11-7-95. 2. Respondent shall pay applicant’s costs. More

The background to the claim is that on 1 April 2004 the plaintiff leased its premises, namely 55 Coventry Road, Harare, to the defendant for the purposes of Light Manufacturing and Allied Trade. The lease agreement was extended on a number of times and the last … extension was to the end of 30 September 2009. More

Applicant, as its name suggests is a manufacture of wood products. The door manufacturing process called veneering consumes large quantities of glue. This glue is made from urea resin, water and a hardener. At importation the urea resin is in powder form. Applicant imports the urea resin from Dynea Wood and Speciality Adhesives of Norway and Saudi Arabia. The trade name for urea resin is Aerolite FFD when manufactured in Norway and Dynorit L-530 when manufactured in Saudi Arabia. Its chemical name is urea formaldehyde polymer. The chemical formula is expressed as C-H4-N2-O.C-H2O. In simple language it is a polymer... More

This is the return day of a provisional order initially granted by Kwenda J on 28 March 2025. The Borrowdale Ratepayers’ and Residents’ Association (“the applicant”) seeks confirmation of that provisional order, which interdicted the second respondent’s building project pending determination of the legality of the first respondent’s approvals. The City of Harare (“the first respondent”) and Leonard Mukumba (“the second respondent”) oppose the confirmation of the order. They raise, inter alia, preliminary issues of this court’s jurisdiction (contending that the applicant failed to exhaust domestic remedies), the propriety of the relief being pursued (arguing that an interim interdict cannot... More

This is an application for review in terms of which the applicants seek the setting aside of the decision of the fourth respondent rendered on 13 May 2022 under ACC 26/21 and judgment number AC 7/22. Additionally, the applicants also seek costs of suit against the first, second and third respondents jointly and severally, the one paying the others to be absolved. More