The applicant is a statutory body, established as such in terms of s 3 of the Revenue Authority Act [Cap 23:11]. It is established as a body corporate, capable of suing and being sued in its own name and, subject to the Act, of performing all acts that bodies corporate may by law perform. Section 4 of the same Act defines its powers as being:
a) to act for the state in assessing, collecting, and enforcing the payment of all revenues;
b) to advise the Minister on matters relating to the raising and collection of revenues; and
c) to perform... More
Acting on reasonable suspicion that the second and third respondents’ three drivers were entering Zimbabwe with loaded fuel, the applicant placed the respondents’ three trucks and their contents under notices of seizure. More
This is an appeal against the judgment rendered by the Magistrates Court in which an order was made for the appellant to unconditionally release a motor vehicle horse, registration number JTC043MP and two trailers registered under numbers JKX559MP and JKX583MP and to pay costs on a higher scale. More
Applicant has applied for an urgent stay of execution of a default judgment granted against it and in favour of the respondent on 21 September 2022 in case No. 4496/22 pending determination of applicant’s application for the rescission of the said default judgment which applicant filed on 28 September 2022. The urgent application is made in terms of rule 60(1) of the High Court Rules 2021 and is opposed by the respondent. Applicant became aware of the default judgment the subject of the application for a stay of execution on receipt on 27 September 2022 of a letter from respondent’s... More
This is an appeal against a decision rendered by a magistrate which compelled the appellant to release unconditionally, a vehicle it had impounded from the respondent with each party bearing its own costs.
The brief facts giving rise to this matter are that on the 25th of April 2020, members of FERET team who were patrolling along the Limpopo river area intercepted the respondent’s vehicle which was loaded with unaccustomed goods. It was alleged that the vehicle in question was being driven by the respondent who produced his identification document with number 43- 162579 W 43. The smuggled goods were... More
