Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an application for a declaratur, in terms of which the applicant seeks the following order: 1. The application for a declaratur be and hereby succeeds. 2. It be and is hereby declared that the respondent’s claims for payment against the applicant, which claims are based on the architectural designs and works that were carried out and submitted by the respondent to the applicant in the year 2007, arising from, out of and in connection with the agreement that was entered into by and between the applicant and respondent on or about 24 March 2006, have been extinguished by... More

Applicant sought the setting aside of part of the arbitral award in terms of Article 34 of the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15]. More

The plaintiff is described in the summons and declaration as a company incorporated in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. The defendant did not take issue with the description of the plaintiff as a company. A reading of the subsequent filed pleadings clearly show that the plaintiff is a union. As such the plaintiff must be an unincorporated association since the citation does not include the references, “private limited” or “limited” as required in law where a company is involved. The correct reference is important as it informs the court of the plaintiff’s locus standi and legal standing to bring... More

This is an application for the setting aside of an arbitral award in terms of Article 34 of the Model Law (Schedule to the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7.15] which provides in Sub-Article 2 as follows: “Any arbitral award may be set aside by the High Court only if- (a) ….. (b) the High court finds, that – (i) the subject-matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of Zimbabwe, or (ii) the award is in conflict with the public policy of Zimbabwe.” More

ZIMBABWE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION AND PROGRESSIVE TEACHERS UNION OF ZIMBABWE AND AMALGAMATED RURAL TEACHERS UNION OF ZIMBABWE AND EDUCATORS UNION OF ZIMBABWE AND CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES VERSUS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND THE PRESIDENT, REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE AND MINISTER OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MINISTER OF PUBLIC SERVICE LABOUR AND SOCIAL WELFARE AND MINISTER OF JUSTICE LEGAL AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL ZIMBABWE TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION AND PROGRESSIVE TEACHERS UNION OF ZIMBABWE AND AMALGAMATED RURAL TEACHERS UNION OF ZIMBABWE AND EDUCATORS UNION OF ZIMBABWE AND CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES VERSUS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND THE PRESIDENT, REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE AND MINISTER OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MINISTER OF PUBLIC SERVICE LABOUR AND SOCIAL WELFARE AND MINISTER OF JUSTICE LEGAL AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL (2024-09-30)
The applicants seek a declaratory order in terms of s 85(1) of the Constitution as read with s 14 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]. They argue that because the Constitution in s 65, entrenched the right to collective bargaining and to organize, the current scenario where public servants are precluded from doing so is not only untenable but also unconstitutional. They contend that the perception that the right to collective bargaining is being implemented is a facade because what is being undertaken currently is simply a consultative process based on the provisions of the repealed Constitution. That they... More