The first applicant is a director and shareholder in the second applicant, a registered company operating a trucking business. The first applicant is married to the respondent. However, on 2 November 2023, the respondent filed summons for divorce and other ancillary relief before this court in case number HCH 7124/23 and the said matter is still pending. The first applicant avers that she holds 33% shareholding in the second applicant and that the other shares were held by one Newman Ishe Chinofunga who has since relinquished his shareholding and directorship duties in the company. These averments were not disputed by... More
MAKONI J: The plaintiff issued summons out of this court claiming damages in the sum of $100 000-00, interest at the prescribed rate from date of issue of summons to date of payment and costs of suit. More
It being the court’s considered view that this appeal was without merit, vexatious and abuse of court process we dismissed the appeal with costs on an attorney-client scale on 23 February 2017. More
This matter makes bad reading and its background can be summarised as follows:-
After the arbitrator had considered the submissions made by both the applicant and the first respondent, the Arbitrator determined the matter in favour of the first respondent and ordered the applicant to pay the respondent a total sum of $10 060-00 (ten thousand and sixty dollars) for having unfairly terminated the latter’s employment. This determination was made on 17 November 2011. More
