On 30 January 2017, the applicant filed this urgent chamber application seeking the following interim relief:
“1. That the first and second respondents be and are hereby directed to repay to the applicant any and all monies taken by them pursuant to the issue by the first respondent of the notice in terms of s 58 of the Income Tax Act [Chapter 23:06] from the accounts as detailed hereunder More
The applicant, a transport company duly incorporated according to the laws of Zimbabwe brought this urgent application for the following interim relief:
“1. More
The three appellants were charged with criminal abuse of office as public officers as defined in s 174(1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Chapter 9:23]. They were all sentenced to pay affine of US$450-00 or in default of payment 3 months imprisonment. In addition 12 months imprisonment was wholly suspended for five years on the usual condition of good behaviour. They appeal against conviction only. More
1. This is an appeal against the judgment of the magistrate’s court convicting the appellant of rape as defined in s 65 of the Criminal Law Code.
2. The trial court found that the appellant had appeared at the complainant’s mother’s residence, while the mother was away, and raped the complainant. That girl was 10 years old at the time. More
This was a chamber application for condonation and upliftment of bar. The applicant, CFI Holdings Limited [“CFI Holdings”] is one of five defendants sued by the first respondent, Stalap Investments [Private] Limited [“Stalap Investments”], in the main action under the case reference number HC 1855-20 [“the main action”]. More
