1. The 1st defendant’s conduct of registering 4th defendant using forged documentation be declared fraudulent and consequently all actions flowing there from be declared a nullity, in particular: -
a) That the registration of Wozheri Stone Crushers (Private) Limited by the 5th respondent on the 29 November 2017 be declared null and void and consequently set aside.
b) The memorandum of agreement entered in between the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant on 28 November 2017 be declared null and void and of no force.
c) Transfer of the mining claims, Jilikin 25 registration number 12641 BM from the 1st... More
The parties appeared before ZHOU J in case no. HC 7529/21 which was an urgent application brought by the applicants against the same respondents herein and other respondents who are not parties herein. ZHOU J granted a provisional order in favour of the applicants on 28 December, 2020. More
This is an urgent chamber application for leave to execute pending appeal. The judgment which is being sought to be executed upon was granted in Case No. HC 6457/20 on 5 April 2023 following an action instituted by the applicants against the respondents herein. The operative portion of the judgment is as follows:
The first defendant (Eliazel Mushiringi)’s conduct of registering Wozheri Stone Crushers Pvt. Ltd. Using forged documentation be and is hereby declared fraudulent and all actions flowing therefrom are declared a nullity. More
The plaintiff who runs an Architectural Practice sued the defendant, a Church for fees he claimed he earned when he provided architectural services in designing the defendants, church building.
The plaintiff was initially contracted by one Huni a member of the defendant’s church in his personal capacity to design drawings of the defendant’s proposed church building for purposes of persuading the City of Harare to sell a church stand to the defendant. He performed that task to Huni’s expectation, and was paid the agreed fee. The defendant as a result got a church stand from City of Harare. The defendant... More
This is an appeal against bail refusal in a matter wherein the appellant is facing one count each of smuggling as defined in s 182 of the Customs & Excise Act
[Chapter 23:02] and criminal abuse of duty as a public officer as defined in s 174(1)(b) of the Criminal Law (Codification & Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. More
