On 8 March 2021, the applicant filed an application for bail pending trial on one count of robbery and another count of attempted rape. The matter was only argued on 16 April 2021 after several postponements. I dismissed the application and gave brief reasons in court. The applicant has requested detailed reasons for the dismissal of his application to enable him to progress the matter further. The following are the reasons. More
: Plaintiff issued summons against the defendant, on 21 November 2017, claiming an order for eviction, holding over damages in the amount of $7 873,97 per month from 1 October 2017 to date of eviction and legal practitioner and client costs. More
The facts which are fairly straightforward and common cause in this matter can safely be summarised as follows:
The applicant is a company duly registered and incorporated in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. The respondent is a registered commercial bank with a number of branches in Zimbabwe.
The applicant runs two distinct corporate bank accounts with the respondent’s Kwekwe branch. As of October 2007 the applicant’s two accounts had an aggregate credit balance of forty seven thousand seven hundred and thirty nine dollars and eighty six cents (US$47 739-86). More
The applicants seek spoliatory relief and an interdict against 1st respondent. The application was filed on 15 March 2021. 1st Applicant is a housing co-operative registered in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. Its founding affidavit was deposed to by its chairperson CHARLES SAUNGWEME. 2nd applicant is a member of the 1st applicant. He deposed to his own affidavit which essentially augments 1st applicant’s affidavit. There is also a supporting affidavit by SIDNEY MUMBAMARWO, who is a member of 1st applicant. More
BACHI MZAWAZI J: On the 28th of November 2019 applicant and the first respondent entered into an agreement of sale of a motor vehicle, Land Rover Discovery Engine number 03255292276DT, Chassis number SALLAAA138A491750 for the sum of US$10 000,00, United States ten thousand dollars. The vehicle in question, is alleged to have been imported by the second respondent and given to the first respondent to sale on his behalf. At the conclusion of the sale transaction, delivery of the vehicle itself, the ignition keys alongside the accompanying original documents consisting of the Customs clearance certificate, declaration and Customs payment receipts... More
