On 10 July 2007 my brother UCHENA J issued the following order against the respondent:-
“1. The respondent be and is hereby interdicted from unlawfully interfering with
applicant’s right of occupation and use of piece of land namely Rhodo 2, 26, 51
and 52 situated at Willesden Farm, Goromonzi.
2. The respondent be and is hereby interdicted from making any threats against applicant and his workers and or interfering with them in any manner.
3. The respondent is ordered to keep peace towards applicant.
4. The respondent shall pay costs of this application.” More
The applicant is the director of two duly registered real estate companies, Pride Real Estate and Ascent Real Estate. He is alleged to have fraudulently sold a residential stand in Mount Pleasant Heights for US$15 000-00 sometime in 2007 and converted the proceeds to his own use.
Investigations revealed that the applicant has a similar pending case under CRB 4634/11. He is also facing an additional charge of fraudulently faking his qualifications to gain registration as an estate agent.
The presiding magistrate denied the applicant bail on the basis that he has a propensity of committing fraud and therefore was... More
The plaintiff is a former employee of the defendant. The defendant is a duly incorporated company in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe.
The plaintiff was employed by defendant from 1990 to 2006. He was employed as a Cibra Machine Operator. Later he was assigned to work as an Assistant Tapeline 11 Machine Operator. More
The first applicant and the second respondent have a long standing dispute between them. The dispute centres on the control and ownership of the second applicant. Each one of them claims that it is a director of the second applicant. More
The bare bones of the dispute in this appeal are these: The appellant and the first respondent entered into a lease agreement for premises situate at 26 East Road, Belgravia, Harare on 16 May, 2003. On 14 March, 2008, the first respondent, following its cancellation of the lease agreement, obtained an order in the Magistrates’ court under case number MC 1701/07. The contentious order was couched in these words: More
