Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The plaintiff’s claim against the defendant is for- a) Payment of US$12 000.00 being the damages for the actual loss of the plaintiff’s six (6) Brahman cattle which died after drinking from a cyanide pool. b) Payment of an additional US$6 000.00 for damages for the four (4) Brahman cattle which died which were in calf. c) Payment of US$182 000.00 being damages for prospective loss of income which the plaintiff would have realized from the six cattle which died had they reached their maximum breeding level. d) Interest on the total sum of US$200 000.00 at the rate of... More

The applicant was employed as Group Engineering Director by the first respondent, which represented itself as a holding company comprising several subsidies with the second respondent as its Chief Executive Officer. More

On 13 October 2011 after hearing both counsel I dismissed the application with costs. The reasons given for the dismissal were as follows: The applicant approached this court seeking an order to rescind two judgments granted against him in default in case number HC1448/05. The default judgments were granted on 1 June 2005 and on 6 April 2006. He also sought an order that he files his plea to the summons in HC1448/05 within ten days from the grant of this order. More

The third and fourth respondents are husband and wife respectively. They purchased stand 5993 Warren Park North, Westlea, Harare (“property”) from the sixth respondent. They did so in terms of a written contract which the sixth respondent and them signed on 9 June 1998. The agreement appears at p 26 of the record. More

This urgent chamber application is for the stay of execution of an order of this court granted on 9 October 2024 in HC 4048/24 in favour of the first respondent on the unopposed motion roll. The order was granted in default pursuant to a claim for provisional sentence by the first respondent against the applicant in the sum of US$18, 801.00. The order led to the attachment of the applicant’s property by the second respondent through a notice of execution STL 3792 of 31 October 2024. The removal of the property was scheduled to take place on 6 November 2024. More