The second and third defendants are, in fact, the same person cited twice in the proceedings instituted by the plaintiff by way of summons. The summons was served together with what purports to be the plaintiff’s declaration, to which was attached an “affidavit to prove damages”. In response, the second and third defendants objected to the claim on three distinct grounds. The first objection is by way of exception to the summons and declaration on the basis that they do not disclose a cause of action and, alternatively, that they are vague and embarrassing. The defendants have also raised the... More
The applicant purchased stand number 7 Dove Crescent Vainona (“the property”) from the first respondent. The first respondent and him concluded the agreement of sale on 21 August 2001. More
The applicant seeks an order setting aside the judgment, granted after a full trial, by my sister, CHIRAWU-MUGOMBA J, on 10 November 2021 in favour of the first and second respondents under case number HC 8317/10and under Judgment number HH627/21 on the grounds that the judgment in question contains a patent error. More
The twenty applicants have approached this court seeking a spoliation order. They are entreating the court to order the respondent to “restore access, possession and occupation of certain piece of land called Athena of Longford measuring one hundred and twelve comma two hectares to the applicants forthwith by removing the fence it erected around the land” and grant costs against the respondent. More
This is an application for bail pending trial.
The applicant is on remand at the Harare Magistrates Court. He is facing one count of robbery and another count of rape as defined in Sections 126 and 65, respectively, of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] More
