The plaintiff issued summons against the defendant claiming payment of US$16 175 740-72 for fees owed by the defendant for professional services at the defendant’s special instance and request in or around 2007. The amount was due and payable sometime around 3 April 2009. More
The plaintiff herein claims general damages for unlawful arrest, detention and assault by two police officers, the 3rd and 4th defendants. In particular, he seeks damages for shock, pain and suffering, and for contumely, unlawful arrest and detention, in the total sum of US$4,000. The defendants accept that the plaintiff was lawfully arrested, but deny that he was assaulted or otherwise maltreated. More
Applicant is claiming from respondent payment of $255 689 400 for goods delivered to respondent. Applicant has averred that on 30 August 2005, following telephonic communication with one Bernard, respondent’s employee, it provided a quotation for 200 rolls of thermal shelf talkers and 1000 rolls of thermal computer labels. Orders were placed by the respondent as per the quotation. The 200 rolls of thermal shelf talkers and 1000 rolls of thermal computer labels were duly delivered to respondent on 5 September 2005 and received by the respondent’s employees. On 6 September 2005, a Mr Alan Pirie, the general manager of... More
The only issue which stands for determination for now is whether the plaintiff is a legal persona and whether the plaintiff has locus standi in judicio. The plaintiff sued the defendant seeking recovery of US$60 500 being the sale proceeds of gold bullion. The defendant has denied liability and also challenged the plaintiff’s legal persona and locus standi. More
The plaintiffs issued summons out of this court on 2 October 2009 seeking the following relief:
“1. That the first defendant is according to the law and prevailing principles of succession of
the chieftainship in the Wanyama (Hata) clan hereby declared unfit, illegitimate and
unsuitable to preside over theWanyama (Hata) community as chief.
2. Additionally or alternatively the process leading to the second defendant’s submission of
the first defendant’s name to third and fourth defendants for appointment be and is hereby
declared to be contrary to law and the prevailing principles of succession of the Wanyama
(Hata) clan.
3. The... More
