The appellant was convicted of fraud in contravention of s 136(a) & (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Chapter 9:23], in that on 21st August 2020, with intent to deceive one Enock Atukwa, or realising that there was a real risk or possibility of deceiving Enock Atukwa and intending to cause Enock Atukwa to act upon the misrepresentation to the prejudice of Dorcas Kandiero or realising that there was a real risk or possibility that Anock Atukwa may act upon the misrepresentation to the prejudice of Dorcas Kandiero by misrepresenting that he was the son of Dorcas... More
This is an appeal against the granting of an application for summary judgment against the appellant by the court below. Having issued summons against the now appellant as the defendant, and an appearance to defend having been entered, the respondent herein applied for summary judgment claiming arrear rentals in the sum of US$8800.00 or its equivalent in Zimbabwean dollars at the prevailing bank rate for the lease of No 18 Harrow Road Masasa, Harare. Also sought was the cancellation of the lease agreement and an eviction of the appellant and all those claiming occupation through them from No 18 Harrow... More
This is an urgent chamber application in which the interim relief sought is that execution, and or attachment, and or removal of property in case number HC 2593/13 be stayed pending determination of an application for a declaratur that the execution is irregular and unlawful, and, that, the ejectment of the applicant and all those claiming occupation through it be stayed pending determination of the same application for a declaratur. The final relief sought is a declaratur, that the execution in terms of case number HC 2593/13 be declared irregular, a declaratur that the debt has been paid in full... More
After hearing argument on September14 2018 I dismissed this application with costs.
I stated that the reasons would be furnished in writing.
On the same day, around 16:35 hrs, the Registrar placed a letter before me.
It was authored by the applicant’s legal practitioners. They were requesting the reasons for my decision for purposes of appeal.
These are those reasons.
This is a court application for review of the disciplinary proceedings wherein first respondent convicted applicant of contravening para 35 (1) of the schedule to the Police Act [Chapter 11:10] (“the Act”) as read with section 29 and 34 of... More
The two applicants’ were charged under the Police Act [Chapter 11:10] for contravening para 35 of the Schedule of offences to the Police Act, as read with ss 29 and 34 of the said Act.
On count one, the state alleges as follows;
“In that on 26 June 2017 and at or near C.I.D Chitungwiza offices, Chitungwiza, the defaulter, being a member of the Police Service, did wrongly and unlawfully acted in a manner reasonably likely to bring discredit to the Police Force, that is to say, the defaulter, after recovering a box containing 50 x 100ml bottles of broncleer... More
