This judgment covers two urgent applications. The parties are the same. I shall refer to the first application as “the application.” In opposing the application, the respondent raised a counter-application, (hereinafter referred to as “the counter-application.) For convenience, the citation of the parties shall remain the same in both the application and counter-application. I will deal with the application and counter-application separately in this judgment. Both applications are fiercely contested. More
This is an application filed on urgency by a self-actor seeking an order in the following terms;
“INTERIM RELIEF:
a) An order barring and interdicting the respondents from disturbing or interfering with the applicant’s right to prospect minerals at Queensdale Farm in Kadoma.
b) An order directing the respondents to observe peace at the applicant and its assignees.
TERMS OF FINAL ORDER SOUGHT
1. It is hereby declared that the actions by the 1st respondent to disturb applicant from exercising its right to prospect and search for minerals at Queensdale in Kadoma is hereby declared unlawful.
2. 1st respondent to... More
This is an opposed urgent chamber application in which the first and second applicants seek the following relief:
IT IS ORDERD THAT:
1. The respondent and all those claiming occupation through him be and are hereby ordered to restore vacant possession of the mining location being a position of Queensdale Farm measuring 9 hectares with the following co-ordinates: 199925; 7958476; B0200125; 7958914; C0200278; 7958822; D0200115; 7958045; DP0200045; 7958510 to the applicants upon service of this order.
2. Respondent shall pay costs of suit More
The first and second applicants have approached this court on an urgent basis seeking the relief for leave to sue the second respondent in terms of Section 126(1)(b) of the Insolvency Act [Chapter 6:07]. In particular, the Applicants’ prayer, according to the draft order reads as follows:
“1. Application for leave to sue the 2nd Respondent be and is hereby granted.
2. 1st Respondent shall pay costs of suit.” More
This matter was filed as a chamber application for the appointment of a curator ad litem in terms of r 61(2)(b) of the High Court Rules, 2021. The specific order sought is as follows:
1. “The chamber application for the appointment of a curator ad litem is hereby granted.
2. Caleb Mutandwa is hereby appointed as curator ad litem for the two minor children namely Mutsawashe Mukondorongwe born on the 27th of August 2009 and Forbes Kunashe Mukondorongwe born on the 15th of May 2017 in the applicant’s intended application.,
3. The applicant and first respondent shall contribute an equal... More
