Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an application for the review of the decision of the second respondent in his capacity as the President of the first respondent to suspend the applicants from their official positions with the first respondent. The applicants seek the setting aside of the decision to suspend them. They also seek that they be reinstated and that the second respondent be ordered to conduct a national congress that is in terms of the first respondent’s constitution and electoral practices. More

This is an application for an interdict in which the applicants seek a mandatory interdict against the respondents, compelling them to pay the applicants their end of project benefits as per their promise. The applicants are all former employees of Constitution Parliament Select Committee (COPAC) mandated to draft the Constitution of Zimbabwe. COPAC winded up their activities in 2013 by drafting a draft constitution and submitting a report to the Parliament of Zimbabwe. More

This matter was initially set down for hearing on 11 June 2009 on which date it was postponed to 10 July 2009. It was again postponed a number of times and was finally heard on 3 February 2011 after which date the court called for supplementary heads of argument from both legal practitioners for reasons appearing later in this judgment. More

The applicant seeks a declaratur to the effect that he paid the full purchase price in terms of an agreement of sale between the parties dated 20 October 2016. The order sought is also to the effect that the payments of the deposit plus monthly instalments, from December 2017 to August 2020 by the applicant to the respondent’s bank account, were in accordance with the agreed terms of sale agreement between the parties. Ancillary relief is also sought in that the applicant seeks that the respondent be ordered to sign all necessary documents to effect transfer of ownership to him... More

This is an urgent chamber application wherein the applicant seeks the following relief; ‘TERMS OF FINAL ORDER SOUGHT That you show cause to the Honourable Court why a final order should not be made in the following terms— 1. That the third respondent be and is hereby directed to cancel the Deed of Transfer passed in favour of the first respondent over a certain 300 square metres of land called stand 10346 Kuwadzana Township of Fountainbleu Estate situate in the district of Salisbury. 2. That the party opposing to bear the costs of this application on the higher scale of... More