The respondent’s counsel applied for upliftment of the automatic bar and for condonation for late filing of Heads of Argument on behalf of the second respondent. She said the second respondent was initially represented by another law firm which renounced agency on 7 November, 2013. The second respondent himself deposed to an affidavit to the effect that he had encountered difficulties with his previous lawyers who were not working on the case while at the same time unwilling to give him his file until 7 November, 2013when they eventually did so. The applicant opposed the application but in the interests... More
This is an urgent chamber application for an interim order interdicting the first respondent from publishing a voters’ roll with the photograph of the applicant. The final relief sought is for s 9(c) of the Electoral (Voter Registration) Regulations, 2017, which are contained in Statutory Instrument 85 of 2017 to be declared ultra vires s 57 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe. The application is opposed by the third to thirteenth respondents. The first and second respondents elected to abide by the decision of this court. The first defendant filed an affidavit solely for the purpose of placing certain pertinent information... More
This application arises from the judgment of my sister MAKARAU JP (as she then was) delivered on 21 November 2007 under case number HC 6844/06 (Judgment HH 81/2007). The applicants sought and were granted an order that certain immovable property, namely, stand 658, of Quinington Township of Subdivision 6 of Quinington of Borrowdale be transferred to themselves pursuant to a contract of sale entered into between them and the respondent. More
At the hearing of this matter, the respondent was automatically barred from appearing before the court as he had not filed his heads of argument within the time prescribed in the rules. A formal court application was filed on 4 September, 2007 seeking the up-liftment of the bar. The application was opposed. More
