Welcome to Midlands State University Library
logo
Mail Us research@library.msu.ac.zw
Our Location Midlands State University Library, Senga Road
Call Us +263 542 226 4445
Menu

Electronic Court judgements

  • Home
  • Court Judgements

Court Judgements

Browse Court Judgements by court
The Applicant seeks to evict the first respondent from a piece of land he was allocated in 2012 by way of an offer letter from the second respondent dated 24 September 2012. More

GILBERT TAWANDA KAGURU VERSUS MASTER OF HIGH COURT AND THOUKIDIDES DEMETRIOU N.O THOUKIDIDES DEMETRIOU N.O HC 6236/21 (IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE EXECUTOR IN THE ESTATE LATE EUSTACHES ORPHANIDES DR 463/21 VERSUS GILBERT TAWANDA KAGURU AND VUSUMUZI MTHETHWA AND DIVVYMAN ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES N.O AND MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT N.O THOUKIDIDES DEMETRIOU N.O HC 6243/21 (IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE EXECUTOR IN THE ESTATE LATE EUSTACHES ORPHANIDES DR 463/21 VERSUS GILBERT TAWANDA KAGURU AND VUSUMUZI MTHETHWA AND DIVVY ENTERRPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND REGISTRAT OF COMPANIES N.O AND MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT THOUKIDIDES DEMETRIOU N.O HC 641/22 (IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE LATE EUSTACHES ORPHANIDES DR 463/21, SOLE SHAREHOLDER IN DIVVYMAN ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED REG NO 847/2006 VERSUS GILBERT TAWANDA KAGURU AND THOUKIDIDES DEMETRIOU AND ARTHUR MUSHONGA AND MOSES KACHIKA AND ALISTAIR ALEXANDER CAMPBELL AND RAYMOND ARTHUR BRINK WILKINS AND DIVVYMAN ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT (2024-12-26)
Eustaches Orphanides must be turning, if not rolling in his grave over the disputes that have sprouted after his death over his company, assets and over his will. He is at the very centre of the four consolidated matters before me in this opposed application. He is represented by his executor Thoukidides Demetriou. On the other side is Gilbert Tawanda Kaguru, a former business associate of Eustaches Orphanides. Eustaches died on 23 January 2021 and his estate was registered with the Master of the High Court under DR 463/21. More

MUSAKWA J (in chambers, in terms of s 35 of the High Court Act): The National Prosecuting Authority filed a notice in terms of s 35 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06] to the effect that it does not support the appellant’s conviction and gave reasons for such concession. More

Thirty one bags of sugar soured the relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant to such an extent that on 11 April 2007, the plaintiff issued summons against the defendant claiming delivery of the thirty one bags or alternatively, payment of the market value of the sugar as at the date of judgment, together with interest thereon at the prescribed rate from the date of the failed delivery to date of payment in full and costs of suit. The facts leading to this suit are largely common cause. More

This matter was placed before me as a special case in terms of Order 29 r 199 of the High Court Rules, 1971. More