Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is a bail application lodged by the applicant after his first application was refused by this court. The first application was refused on the 3 November 2022. The applicant, who is jointly charged with other persons, now seeks bail based on changed circumstances. The applicant and his co-accused are charged with one count of robbery as defined in section 126 (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (“the Criminal Code)”. More

The plaintiff and defendant were married in terms of the Marriages Act [Cap 5:11] on 14 January 2005 at HARARE. Their marriage was blessed with one child born on 25 November 2008. More

MUNANGATI-MANONGWA J had occasion to deal with an exception which the respondent raised in the matter of Ignatius Masamba and Secretary – Judicial Service Commission. The issue which related totheexception was heard and conclusively decided under case number HH 978-15. Both parties made submissions at the hearing of the exception. Judgment was entered in the respondent’s favour. More

These were two opposed applications which were heard before me in the opposed roll for the 11th July, 2018. With the concurrence of the applicant these two matters were heard at the same time as the nature of the relief so sought by the applicant was similar in both instances. Case No. HC 6164/17 In case number HC 6164/17 the applicant brought a court application in which he cited The Secretary of the Judicial Service Commission as the respondent. The applicant made a court application in which he referred to as a: “Court application for a mandatory injuction to release... More

The papers filed as constituting this chamber application typify what has been colloquially referred to as a dog’s breakfast both as to content and form. One has to painstakingly read throughthe papers several timesto try and make head or tail of what the applicant’s cause of action is. I have read through the founding affidavit of the applicant several times as it is the document on which a judge can hopefully make out what the cause of action is. The founding affidavit is confusing and deals with unrelated or irrelevant matters to the relief sought. I will try and be... More