Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The applicant instituted proceedings against the respondents claiming the following order: "1. The appointment of Cecil Madondo as Executor Dative in the Estate of the late Stephen Moyo on the 6th October 2004 is set aside. 2. First respondent is directed to appoint applicant as Executor Dative. 3. The costs of this application, if contested shall be paid by the respondents." On the 3rd of June 2005 the applicant filed a notice of withdrawal on the basis that each party pays its own costs. More

The present appeal seeks to determine whether the correct classification of goods for customs purposes was applied in terms of s 87 (3) of the Customs and Excise Act [Chapter 23:02] and s 18 of the Fiscal Appeals Court Act. More

The facts of this matter are common cause. It is not in dispute that on 21 July 2006 at about 11.00 am, the plaintiff was arrested and picked up by two uniformed members of the Zimbabwe Republic Police from his workplace at TPT Transport and Equipment Company in Ardbennie, Harare. He was picked up together with his workmate, one Clement Marioni. They were taken to Southerton Police Station. Upon request by him, the police advised him that he was being treated as a suspect in a case of theft of batteries which had occurred at his workplace. He was only... More

Mr A A Makore who appeared for the respondent indicated that he was no longer representing the respondent and that he had merely attended court out of courtesy and to advise court of his position. He also had not filed a formal notice of renunciation of agency. In any case even if he had hoped to represent the respondent, he was barred by virtue of not having filed heads of arguments in terms of the High Court Rules, 1971 More

: This is an application in which the applicant seeks a provisional order on the following terms – the interim relief as sought reads: “That pending the determination of this matter the applicants are granted the following relief: (a) The first respondent is barred from holding out as a holder of a 50% undivided share in a certain piece of land in Hartley called Swallow field of Johannesburg measuring 127.6238 hectares held under deed of transfer number DT 5157/99 pending the return date and finalisation of this matter. (b) The first respondent is barred from unilaterally dealing in a certain... More