This is a special plea raised by the first and second defendants against the plaintiff’s claim in case HC 7222/11.
At the commencement of the application, the proceedings against the second defendant were by consent of all the parties stayed in terms of s 54 (2) of the Banking Act [Cap 24:20]; it having been placed under curatorship by the Central Bank on 11 June 2012. I proceeded to hear the first defendant’s special plea. More
The parties to this case are embroiled in a contractual dispute. Basically the allegations against the respondent are that he has taken control of farming operations at Inyanga Downs Orchards without the consent of other directors. In its amended draft order the applicant is seeking the restoration of the status quo ante. At the hearing of this application counsel for the respondent raised some points in limine. More
This is an application for an order setting aside the decision by the respondent to forfeit the applicant’s 3 trucks and tankers.Sometime in July 2020, the applicant was contracted by an entity called Lopdale Energy (Pvt) Ltd to ferry a consignment of fuel from Mozambique to Zimbabwe. On 17 July 2020, the applicant’s drivers were served with notices of seizure issued against their 3 trucks. More
The applicant instituted proceedings against the respondents claiming the following order:
"1. The appointment of Cecil Madondo as Executor Dative in the
Estate of the late Stephen Moyo on the 6th October 2004 is set aside.
2. First respondent is directed to appoint applicant as Executor Dative.
3. The costs of this application, if contested shall be paid by the respondents."
On the 3rd of June 2005 the applicant filed a notice of withdrawal on the basis that each party pays its own costs. More
The present appeal seeks to determine whether the correct classification of goods for customs purposes was applied in terms of s 87 (3) of the Customs and Excise Act [Chapter 23:02] and s 18 of the Fiscal Appeals Court Act. More
