The plaintiff issued out summons claiming outstanding rentals, holding over damages and monies outstanding from electricity consumption by its tenants. The brief background to his matter is as follows. The parties entered into a verbal lease in terms of which the defendant leased stand 17018 Graniteside, Harare, a factory from the plaintiff for the period 2003 to May 2014 More
The applicants approached this court seeking an order in the following terms:
“1. That respondent is interdicted from supplying the following components produced from molds or patterns furnished by 1st applicant to respondent to any person other than 1st applicant or a company that he represents;-
Feeder Chamber
Chamber Compression
Head
Single Flight Worms
Double Flight Worms
Steam Locks
Bearing Housings
Clamp Halves
Drive Pullies”
The background to the matter is that the respondent is in the business of producing castings which it sells to customers including the applicant. More
The applicant has approached this court on an urgent basis seeking what is in essence spoliatory relief, restoration to a portion of the respondent’s hotel known as Rainbow Towers Hotel and Conference Centre situated at the second mezzanine floor of the prestigious hotel. The applicant also seeks an order allowing it to continue operations at that portion of the hotel without interference and to be allowed free access to its tools, material and machinery which it placed at that location and related relief. More
This is an application for summary judgment in terms of rule 64 which provides:
“(1) Where the defendant has entered appearance to a summons, the plaintiff may, at any time before a pre-trial conference is held, make a court application in terms of this rule for the court to enter summary judgment for what is claimed in the summons and costs. More
In this urgent chamber application the applicant seeks an interim relief to interdict the first respondent from continuing with execution pending the finalization of the instant case. More
