The applicant and the third respondent had competing claims over the same mining block, called New Year 89.Both of them had valid registration certificates over it. These had been duly issued by the first respondent, the mining commissioner. The first respondent hadresolved the dispute in favour of the third respondent. The applicant had appealed to the second respondent, the Minister of Mines and Mineral Development. The appeal had been dismissed. The applicant then applied to this court for review. But his application wasout of time. So he applied for condonation. More
1. On 22 September 2016 the Regional Court sitting at Mutare convicted the appellant, a 35 year old Congolese refugee, of raping an 8 month old baby girl at Tongogara Refugee Camp in Chipinge. More
Applicant made an application to this honourable court in terms of article 34 (2) (b) (ii) of the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration – 1985 as amended and as incorporated in terms of the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15].
The application was opposed by the 4threspondent. The 1stto 3rdrespondents, perhaps because of the very nature of their offices decided not to file any papers and abide by any decision of the court. More
1. This is an application for leave to appeal the conviction and sentence out of time and to prosecute such intended appeal in person.
2. On 19 October 2018 the Regional Court sitting at Chinhoyi convicted the then 60 year old applicant of three counts of rape as defined in s 65 of the Criminal Law Code.
3. Having treated the counts as one for sentence, the trial court imposed a penalty of 20 years imprisonment 2 years of which were suspended for 5 years on the usual conditions of good behaviour.
4. The Court found that the applicant had... More
The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a written agreement of sale with respect to the property on the 6th of June 2021. The purchase price was set at US$2 500 000 (Two million Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars). The terms and obligations of the parties were set out in the agreement. In breach, the failed to pay the purchase price as required in terms of clause 2 . On the 21st of August 2021, the parties entered into a further agreement varying clause 2. The new date for the payment of the purchase price was extended by a... More
