Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an application for summary judgment in the sum of US $160 788.98. On 5 January 2011 the plaintiff issued summons for payment of US$160 788.98. In his declaration the plaintiff avers that he was appointed Curator Bonis of the estate of the late MuchineripiRishoniGonyora by the third defendant herein, the Master of the High Court. In that capacity he rendered professional services on behalf of the estate. On 3 March 2010 at a taxation hearing conducted by the second defendant he was awarded fees for the duties he had carried out. The award of fees was subsequently confirmed... More

The two records of proceedings suffer from the same procedural irregularity in relation to the disposal of the cases by way of trial on a guilty plea procedure as provided for in terms of s 271(2)(b) as read with s 271(3) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act, [Chapter 9:07]. The cases were dealt with by the same Magistrate at Mount Darwin Magistrates’ Court. More

: The dispute in this matter concerns a piece of land of substantial hectarage situate in the district of Goromonzi called remaining extent of Stuhm measuring 1074.7410 hectares. The property was registered in the name of Cecil Michael Reimer under deed of Transfer No. 3032/87. Consequent upon obtaining a subdivision permit to divide the land, Reimer created subdivisions called Lot 1 measuring 583.1360 hectares and Lots 2 and 3 measuring respectively 412.1091 hectares and 79 4959 hectares. The lots were sold respectively to TBIC Investments and registered under Deed of Transfer No. 1724/09 for Lot 1; to Damall Investments and... More

I have decided in the two cases above that it would make justice “turn on its head” if I did not grant relief to the applicant. These cases were heard together. The parties had agreed to such a course of action. More

On the 25th of August 2022, I granted a provisional order with the following interim relief: “TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHT That you show cause to this Honourable court why a final order should not be made in the following terms: 1. The 2nd respondent be and is hereby ordered to restrain from any action whatsoever on, or with respect to, the piece of land called the remaining extent of Stuhm situated in the District of Goromonzi in Mashonaland East Province measuring 583.1360 hectares until the matter under HC 5231/22 matter (sic) is finalized. 2. The 1st, 2nd and... More