The applicant seeks an order declaring that the premises from which the applicant operates are not “commercial premises” as defined in the Commercial Premises (Rent) Regulations 1983 S.I. 676 of 1983 and an order that the applicant has lawfully terminated the mooring contract that it had with the respondent. The applicant also seeks an order directing the respondent forthwith to remove his boats, including the Ambuya Dambudzo from Marineland harbour, and should be fair to do so the sheriff or his lawful deputy carries out the removal.
The respondent opposes the grant of this order. More
On 6 July 2004 the applicant issued summons against the second respondents, jointly and severally and in solidium for payment of US$900 000-00 which it alleged was overpayment of a loan advanced by the second respondent to the applicant for onward lending to third parties. It alleged that in terms of the agreement between the parties the second respondent would receive repayments directly from third parties and if any overpayment occurred such would be refunded to the applicant. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Provincial Director Matebeland North sitting as a Mining. Commissioner`s Court at Manicaland Province. The sitting of the Provincial Commissioner’s Court was a result of an order rendered by MUZENDA J by consent of the parties under HC 203/18 on 18 September 2019. Said order provides in the main as follows:
HC 203/18 and HC 212/18 were referred to the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Mines and Mining Development for the appointment of a Provincial Mining Commissioner, other than the Provincial Mining Commissioner Manicaland. More
This is an application to compel discovery and the filing of pre-trial documents in HC 13081/12. The respondent has raised the preliminary point that the application is fatally defective for want of the correct form. Further, she submits that the application is improperly before the court, the main matter having been struck off the roll and no application for reinstatement having been made. More
In this matter the applicant sought on an urgent basis an order for stay of execution of a judgment granted in favour of the respondent by this honourable court under case number HC 510/10. I dismissed the application with costs on the legal practitioner and client scale and indicated then that my reasons for doing so would follow. These are they. More
