Applicants 1 to 6 are politicians. So are respondents 1 and 2. Applicant no 7 is a political party. So also is respondent no 3. Applicant no 7 and respondent no 3 use the same name, People’s Democratic Party (“PDP”). The one is a breakaway faction of the other. Respondent no 4 is the Speaker of Parliament (“the Speaker”). Parliament is respondent no 5. Respondent no 6 is the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (“ZEC”). It has not participated in these proceedings. More
The applicant imported a motor vehicle through the Beitbridge Border Post in December 2014 under the Customs and Excise (Suspensions) Regulations which suspended duty on motor vehicles imported by physically handicapped persons (also known as the disability rebate). The applicant, as an individual had met the requirements of the disability rebate in terms of the above Regulations. More
This is an application for leave to execute pending determination, by the Supreme Court, of the appeal against this court’s judgment under HH 339-18. More
The applicant is a police officer. He was charged with acting in a manner likely to bring discredit to the Police Force in contravention of para 35 of the Schedule to the Police Act [Cap 11:10]. A perusal of the record of proceedings shows that he was caught red handed in a police trap after demanding and receiving a bribe. He was searched and found in possession of the bait money. More
