The applicant, a company under liquidation which is represented herein by the liquidator, instituted the instant application seeking the eviction of the respondent and all persons claiming occupation through the respondent from Goodwill Extension of Woodlands of Railway Farm 20 and Remainder of Goodwill of Railway Farm 20. The two pieces of land are owned by the applicants. The respondent is the Executor in the Estate of the late Francis Siamsipa. The application is opposed by the respondent. More
The appellant who stood as the 2nd accused and his co-accused were arraigned before the magistrate Court sitting at Norton for contravening s 157 (1) (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]-dealing in dangerous drugs or alternatively contravening s 157 (1) of the same Act-unlawful possession of a dangerous drug. More
On 30 October 2009 the applicant company filed an urgent chamber application seeking spoliatory relief. The draft order was couched in these terms:
TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHT
That you show cause why an order in the following terms should not be granted;
1. That respondents or any person acting on their behalf shall be and are hereby
barred from in any way interfering with applicant’s possession and control of the portion of Friedwell Farm (that it controlled immediately before 29 October 2009), including in any way interfering with the possession by the applicant’s workers of the farm compound... More
The plaintiff issued summons against the two defendants claiming payment of a sum of US$ 131 046-22, interest thereon at the prescribed rate from 28 February 2014 to date of full payment and costs of suit on the legal practitioner and client scale. More
The applicant’s legal practitioners filed this chamber application headed “Chamber Application for Dismissal of Application in terms of Rule 236 (4) (b) of the High Court Rules,1971.” More
