This litigation and indeed the dispute between the parties could have been avoided. It is the signal failure of the office of the Mining Commissioner to manage a simple mining issue which has brought about the simmering conflict between neighbours, a conflict which could have led to dire consequences, but for, the commendable self- restraint of the parties who have continued to submit themselves to due process only to be let down by the Mining Commissioner’s Office. More
Pursuant to the registration of an arbitral award handed down in favour of the respondents on 17 November 2009, the respondents have proceeded to execute on that order.
The execution currently in full swing has led to the attachment of the applicant equipment some of which constitute the mainstay of its very existence. The applicant’s very existence and the welfare of all its employees including the respondents have been thrown on the spotlight. It is under a serious threat.
Alarmed by the unfolding drama the applicant sought clarification as to what amount was exactly due to the respondents against what... More
This urgent court application was filed in terms of r 59(6) of the High Court Rules, 2021. The applicant seeks spoliatory relief and other interdicts pending the resolution of a shareholder dispute that is currently before arbitration tribunal. That dispute is concerned with a joint venture arrangement between the applicant and the first respondent that involves the affairs of the second respondent. The second, third and fourth respondents were cited as interested parties. They did not oppose the application and were not represented at the hearing. More
The plaintiff and defendant were joined in holy matrimony on 25 March 1972 at Harare in terms of the Marriages Act, 1964(now Chapter 5:11). Their marriage still subsists.
The marriage was blessed with five children who are now adults and self sustaining.
During the subsistence of the marriage the parties acquired some movable assets and an immovable asset namely, No. 17 Dengu Street, Zengeza 1, Chitungwiza.
On 17 May 2014 the plaintiff sued defendant for a decree of divorce and the distribution of the assets acquired during the subsistence of the marriage between the parties More
On 20 November 1998 the plaintiff and the defendant were joined together in holy matrimony by a Minister of religion in terms of the Marriages Act, [Cap 5:11]. It must have been a joyous occasion for the parties and their respective families and friends. Being a ceremony presided over by a minister of religion the usual religious vows to live with each other in sickness and in health ‘until death do us part’ may have been taken by the couple. More
