The application under HC 8522/19 was made in terms of r 449 (1) (a) of the old High Court Rules based on two (2) grounds, namely:
(a) The order was erroneously granted in the absence of the applicant, who is an interested party and whose rights were affected by the order concerned.
(b) The said order was granted in error since the party who obtained the relief was not the one who held the claims that were forfeited by the second and third respondents. The applicant argued that the claims were registered in the names of the fourth and fifth... More
This is an application for the provisional liquidation of the first respondent and for the appointment of Theresa Grimmel as the liquidator in accordance with the requirements of the law. The application is being made in terms of s 6 as read with s 14 of the Insolvency Act [Chapter 6:07] (“the Act"). The application is opposed by the first respondent. More
The first applicant is the former owner of Wakefield Farm, Chegutu, measuring 688.64 hectares in extent. The second applicant resides on a portion of the farm measuring 353.06 hectares.The first applicant is the holder of the offer letter in respect of sub division 2 of Wakefield, 280 hectares in extent More
This is an application for bail brought in terms of section 116 (2) (ii) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act (Chapter 9:07). The applicant is facing one count of robbery as defined in section 126 (1) of the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act (Chapter 9:23). Applicant denies the allegations and maintains that he has been wrongly implicated. Applicant and his co-accused filed an application for bail in this court on 17th February 2023. Under HB-38-23 DUBE-BANDA J dismissed the application for bail on the grounds that applicants were a flight risk given the fact that they faced serious... More
: This is an urgent application in which the applicant seeks to interdict the first and second respondents from forwarding the name of the third respondent for appointment as substantive Chief Ngezi. More
