This is a consolidated judgment for matters HC 1338/21, HC 2366/21 and HC 3281/21. The matters were consolidated by consent of the parties. In this judgment, I refer to the parties as they appear in case HC 1338/21. The applicant seeks the registration of an arbitral award granted in its favor against first to third respondents. In case HC 2366/21, the third respondent seeks the setting aside of the same award whilst in case HC 3281/21, the second respondent also craves for the same relief. More
The first and second plaintiffs are husband and wife. The first defendant is a business man whereas the second defendant is a firm of lawyers duly registered in terms of the laws of this country. More
This is a court application for the registration of an arbitral award in terms of Chapter viii, article 35 of the first schedule to the Arbitration Act, Chapter 7:15 as modified by SI 208/96. The application is opposed by the respondent. More
This is an opposed court application for summary judgment.
On 3 September 2020 the applicant instituted proceedings against the respondents by way of summons under case number HC 4806/20. The relationship between the applicant and respondents (the parties) in this case is regulated by a lease agreement signed on 25 January 2018. In the summons the applicant alleged certain breaches of the lease by the first respondent and seeks relief, inter alia, for the cancellation of the agreement, eviction and recovery of arrear rentals. The second respondent was joined as the second defendant because of his role as a surety... More
The applicants and the first respondent maintained a landlord-tenant relationship. The relationship was based on an agreement of lease which the parties concluded on 4 October, 2006. More
