Family law -Chamber application for guardianship - This matter was placed before me in chambers. The applicant seeks an order that he be awarded guardianship of his almost seventeen year old grandchild K. N born on the 4th of November 2001. More
Applicant and respondent are husband and wife having married in terms of the Marriage Act [Chapter 5:11] on 27 September 1997. The marriage was blessed with two children who are now adults. During the subsistence of the marriage, they acquired a property known as Lot 4 of Chimwemwe of subdivision A Kingsmead of Borrowdale Estate measuring 4212 square metres ( the property). Applicant says the property was acquired by his optional shares from his previous employment. The property was subdivided and stand 916 Borrowdale Township of Lot 4 of Chimwemwe of Subdivision A of Kingsmead Extension of Borrowdale Estate measuring... More
This case raises the preliminarypoint as to whetherthe HighCourt has power to review decisionsofaLabourCourt.It wasarguedin limine that the HighCourtdoesnothavejurisdiction toreviewlabourmatters. Thereasoningwas thatsince boththeHigh Court and the LabourCourthave the samepowersof reviewin labour matters,thisputs themat par. The first respondent argued that the applicant should have approached the Supreme Court on appeal sincethat court could have exercised its review powers in hearing the matter in terms of s 25 of the Supreme Court Act [Chapter7:13]. More
The applicants are employees of the Public Service Commission (PSC) employed as either law officers or public prosecutors and assigned to the prosecution department of the Attorney-General’s Office. The applicants are also executive committee members of the Zimbabwe Law Officers Association (ZILOA), whose membership at a meeting held on 18 September 2011 resolved to embark on a work stoppage from 4 October, 2011 if certain grievances were not met by the PSC. The work stoppage did take place as resolved, and some of the applicants, as spokespersons of the association, gave media interviews on behalf of their membership during the... More
On the 25 of October, I handed down an ex tempore ruling in which I dismissed the applicants’ claim. At that point, the applicants were represented by James Majatame Attorneys At Law. It appears that the applicants have now secured representation from Mugiya and Muvhami Law Chambers who have written requesting an upliftment of the judgment. This is a curious fact as Mugiya and Muvhami Law Chambers were representing the first respondent at the time the matter was heard before me, as evident from the record. It is improper for Mugiya and Muvhami Law Chambers to switch camp at this... More
