for the second respondent
KATIYO J: The applicant is seeking a declarator and consequential relief in terms of section 14 of the High Court Act in the following terms;
IT IS DECLARED THAT:
1. The applicant’s certificate of registration for two mining locations known as Good and Good Days, (registered under certificate of registration number 33908BM, and 33909BM, respectively) are valid and extant.
2. The applicant is entitled to exercise mining rights on the mining locations known as Good Days and Good Days 6 (registered under certificates of registration number 33908BM, and 33909BM, respectively) to the exclusion of the 1st... More
The plaintiff husband issued summons out of this court on 17 December 2009 seeking a decree of divorce on the basis of irretrievable breakdown of marriage, division of matrimonial assets, an award of custody of the four minor children in favour of the defendant and that each party bears its own costs. More
The applicant is a mining company. It seeks an anti-dissipation interdict against the first respondent, also a mining company. The second respondent is the Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Mines and Mining Development (“the Ministry of Mines”). The third respondent is the Provincial Mining Director for the Midlands Province. The fourth respondent is the Minister of Mines himself. More
The claim was based on the grounds that the forfeitures of the Mining Claims were unlawful, illegal, wrongful and malicious. The issuance of the Special Grant No 7321 (the Special Grant) was similarly unlawful having been issued with the connivance of third defendant. On 22 February 2023, it was agreed by Counsels that the matter proceeds in terms of r 52(1) of this Court’s Rules SI 202/2021, as a stated case on the three (3) issues referred to trial. More
This is an appeal against a determination of the Master of the High Court of 20 January 2022 which is made in terms of s 68 J of the Administration of Estates Act,[Chapter 6:01] as read with r 95 of the High Court Rules, 2021. More
