This matter commenced by way of application. In the application the plaintiff sought an order directing the two defendants (“the defendants”) to hand over the registration book of a Datsun Bluebird motor vehicle Registration number 400-802D and to sign all necessary papers to enable the transfer of the ownership of the vehicle to the plaintiff. That relief was opposed by the defendants. The defendants also filed a counter application in which they sought an order directing the plaintiff to surrender forthwith the Datsun bluebird motor vehicle to them and that failing for the Deputy Sheriff to be authorised to seize... More
This matter was placed before me as an application for a declaratur, in terms of s14 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]. The applicants seek an order that the registered nominal shares of the 1st respondent total 24 000 (Twenty-Four thousand) and additionally costs of suit on a legal practitioner to client scale against any respondent who opposes the application. More
The background to this matter is that the applicant, a duly registered company, in terms of the law, entered into a tribute agreement with 1st respondent over several mining claims collectively known as Empress Mine in Mashava. Upon expiry of same, they entered into an agreement of sale. The first agreement was entered into on 27 March 2017 and thereafter another was signed on 7 September 2017 which allegedly met the requirements from Ministry of Mines.
The parties have been in and out of court since 2018 around the issue of Empress Mine. In case HC5673/18, the applicant alleged breach... More
In case HC 6440/18 Lugania is the applicant and seeks an order in the following terms.
That you show cause to this Honourable Court why a final order should not be made in the following terms;
Terms of Final Order Sought
(a) That 2nd respondent should not issue applicant with a resumption certificate for the applicant to resume operations at Empress Mine, following compliance by the applicant and inspection of underground workings thereon by 3rd respondent’s Mines Inspection Personnel
(b) 2nd respondent be and is hereby ordered to issue the applicant with the resumption certificate to resume underground operations in... More
: The plaintiff and defendant herein are brothers. The plaintiff instituted summons in 2016 claiming US$14 731-00 (fourteen thousand seven hundred and thirty one dollars) arising from outstanding dividends which were due and payable from October 2012, interest and costs. The defendant denies liability on the basis that the claim has prescribed and in any case no dividend is payable to the plaintiff as none was declared by the board of directors. More
