In June 2020 judgement was entered in favour of the 1st respondent in the sum of US $ 70 000 and 134 977.92 pounds under case number HC 8500/19 (hereinafter referred to as the court order). The applicant has not appealed the decision. When the amounts were not paid and the 1st respondent desired to have the debt satisfied it sued out a writ of execution. The 2nd respondent attached and sold the applicant’s property to give effect to the writ in foreign currency. The applicant objected to the execution to recover the foreign currency equivalent to the 2nd respondent... More
: The applicant and the respondent are former employee and employer respectively. The relationship came into effect on 1 June 2009 when the parties signed a contract of employment. The employer-employee relationship went sour sometime in January 2011 and the parties agreed to part ways amicably More
The applicant in this matter seeks an order, inter alia, for the reinstatement of his contract of employment and the payment of arrear salaries and benefits from the 1st of January 2002 More
The plaintiff claims that the defendant breached terms of a loan agreement entered into between the parties by failing to advance to the plaintiff the loan amount agreed to. It asserts that its failure to secure the agreed loan resulted in it failing to procure raw materials for its business activities causing loss in business opportunities and profits. The plaintiff claims damages in the sum of $320 000, 00 in order to place it in the position it would have occupied had the breach not occurred. More
The applicant a business entity, applied for leave to institute a Class Action in terms of s 3 of the Class Actions Act [Chapter 8:17](hereinafter referred to as “the Act”)against the respondent. More
