Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is a simple case for summons for provisional sentence anchored on an alleged acknowledgment of debt executed, on 14 February 2017, by one Dr K Karonga, as General Manager of the respondent in this case. It will be necessary in this case to reproduce the document that has given rise to the dispute between the parties. I do so hereunder: More

The applicant applies for condonation of late noting of an application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence in case No. CRB 212/16 now available under judgment HH 515/17. The applicant was convicted by TSANGA J of with assessors of murder as defined in s 47 (b) of the Criminal Law Codification & Reform Act, [Chapter 9:23] following a contested trial which was completed on 2 August 2017. He was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. The applicant was required if minded to note an appeal, to apply orally for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court immediately after the... More

This is a claim for defamatory damages. The plaintiff seeks US$35 000-00 forinjuria and contumelia arising from an article written in the H-Metro of 13 October 2011 by the first defendant, edited by the second defendant and published by the third defendant. The three defendants contested the action. More

This matter was placed before the court as an urgent court application in terms of r 59(6) of the High Court Rules, 2021. The application was accompanied by a certificate of urgency justifying the extraordinary circumstances under which it was brought before the court. The periods within which further affidavits and heads of argument were to be filed, were accordingly truncated with the consent of counsel. The applicant seeks the following relief against the respondent: More

The applicant filed a chamber application seeking the following relief as set out in its draft order; “TERMS OF FINAL ORDER SOUGHT That the respondents show cause to this Honourable Court on the return date why a final order not be granted in the following terms (a) That the 1st respondent shall not remove for sale the applicant’s property attached on 17th November, 2015 without further instructions from the 2nd respondent. (b) That 1st respondent pays costs of suit. TERMS OF FINAL ORDER GRANTED Pending the determination of this matter, the applicants are granted the following relief: 1. That the... More