On 14 April 2021, after reading documents filed of record and hearing Counsel for the applicant and for the respondents, I pronounced the following order:
“IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The first respondent’s actions, on 21 September 2020, in impounding the applicant’s Subaru motor vehicle, without warrant of court order, were unlawful, null and void
2. Part 1, relating to items 1 to 4 being fees that are expressed in United States Dollars, of the Vehicle Registration and Licensing (Amendment Regulations 2020) (No 21), published as Statutory Instrument 166 of 2020 be and is hereby declared to be ultra vires... More
As you will be aware, the application among other things seeks to challenge the constitutionality of the Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) Act [Chapter 10:20] amended to Electoral Act Regulations 2016 published in Statutory Instrument 117/2017.
3. As you are aware of, the regulations we (sic) enacted on 15 September 2017 and therefore they will naturally expire by 15 March 2017.
4. In order to avoid a situation where arguments will be academic on aspects of the regulations, and given the fact that both parties have filed heads of argument in this matter., we seek that the matter be determined urgently.”... More
This is an appeal in terms of section 65 of the Income Tax Act, ( ITA) where on 10 October 2018 the parties agreed that the main issues for determination would be the following:
“1. Whether or not the separate mining operations under the Appellant’s portfolio were inseparable and substantially interdependent, such that capital allowances in respect of the different mines should have been allowed under one tax return for each tax year period.
2. In the event of a finding being made that the issuance of separate income tax assessments for each mining unit was proper, whether or not... More
The applicants approached this court seeking an order in the following terms:
“1) The decision by the first and second respondents in refusing to renew the fishing permits for the first, second and third applicants be and is hereby set aside.
2) The first and second respondents are hereby directed to issue fishing permits to the first, second and third applicants upon payment of the requisite fees and compliance with one statutory requirements.
3) The first and second respondents shall pay costs of suit jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved More
The plaintiff and the defendant are husband and wife who were married in terms of the then Marriage Act [Chapter 5:11] in 2006. Whereas the plaintiff said that this followed an unregistered customary law union entered in 2004, the defendant insisted that this was in 1999. Three children were born to this marriage namely Takudzwa L. Shereni (born 8 August 1999), Tinotenda Shereni (born 22 December 2004) and Tawananyasha B. Shereni (born 28 November 2012). More
