I heard this application on 7 December, 2021. I delivered an ex tempore judgement in which I dismissed the same with costs.
The High Court registrar addressed a letter to me. He did so on 2 March, 2021. He requested reasons for my decision. He advised that the applicant intends to appeal my decision. These are they:-
The applicant applied for a stand at the Remainder of Carrick Creagh of s 4 of Borrowdale Estate, Carrick Creagh Township, Harare. He filed his application through Sally Mugabe Housing Co-operative (“Sally”) on 27 March, 2007. He was/is a member of Sally. More
This is an application for the following declaratur in terms of s 14 of the High Court Rules Act [Chapter 7:06]
1. That the franchise agreement be and is hereby declared to have been terminated by notice given by the respondent on 31 March 2012. More
This is an application for a declaratur in terms of s 14 of the High Court Act. The background facts are that the applicant was employed by the respondent, Mashonaland Tobacco Company (“MTC”) under a fixed term contract from 2006, as a messenger in the stores and procurement department. It is the applicant’s contention that in 2009 his salary was reduced without his consent and knowledge. He also states that in 2015 his contract was changed from a fixed term contract to a seasonal contract. It is from this that the applicant’s grievance stems. In essence, the applicant’s complaint is... More
In this application the applicant seeks a declaratur nullifying the appointment of second to tenth respondents as provincial governors on the grounds that such appointments are ultra vires and or in contravention of the Constitution of Zimbabwe. The applicant also seeks such consequential declarations as may become necessary in the event that this court nullifies the appointments. More
The melancholic drama unfolding in this case makes one wonder whether these are the wages of marrying during the sacred month of November in apparent violation of a well-established Shona custom prohibiting marriage during that month. The first applicant’s intended marriage to the second applicant is mired in perpetual controversy and acrimony as the couple continues to be hounded by the first applicant’s marriage to the second respondent allegedly contracted on 21 November 2011. More
