This is an appeal against the decision of the Provincial Magistrate sitting at Harare delivered on 30 March 2012 in which he dismissed an application by the appellants for the suspension of their sentence of 12 months imprisonment or 420 hours of community service at institutions in Harare and Chinhoyi. More
The plaintiff and defendant were married on 29 October 2007 in terms of the then Marriage Act [Chapter 5:11] at Guruve. The marriage was blessed with three children, Rufaro Chengeta (born on 9 April 2001) (Rufaro), Isaac Simbarashe Chengeta (born on 1 March 2003) (Isaac) and Michaela Ropafadzo Chengeta (born on 2 August 2013) (Michaela). On 19 July 2017 plaintiff sued out summons claiming a decree of divorce and ancillary relief. In her declaration she stated that the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down such that there is no reasonable prospect of restoration of a normal marriage relationship.... More
The applicant is employed by the respondent as a Revenue Officer stationed at Masvingo. Consequently, the applicant is bound by the respondent’s Registered Code of Conduct i.e. the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority Employment Code of Conduct and Grievances Procedure (the Code of Conduct). On 27 November 2017, the applicant was charged with misconduct and was suspended from employment without pay and benefits in terms of clause 10.1 (a) of the Code of Conduct. The misconduct pertained to making false declarations by the applicant in respect of assets he owns. The respondent avers that due to the nature of its organisation, it... More
On 12 January 2018 the applicant applied for bail pending appeal. In his affidavit in support of the application for bail he submits that that there are real prospects of success on appeal. More
The applicant and two other co-accused persons stand charged with the murder of one Sipho Million Mncube. The crime was allegedly committed on 12 March 2020. As part of his investigations, the second respondent who happens to be the investigating officer, approached the third respondent for an order to compel the applicant to produce samples of his blood for comparison with samples of blood on some recovered blood stained clothes. The applicant withheld his consent to the extraction of his blood samples for that purpose.It is the warrant of search and seizure that was issued by the third respondent on... More
